Closed enm10k closed 11 months ago
they are not mis-configured because they are merely examples - users will need to adjust the policies based on their business requirements
said differently - we have examples that create S3 buckets but the buckets are not encrypted. Is this mis-configured? I would argue no because there is no context other than they are examples for demonstration and testing purposes; users will need to configure the appropriate settings for their individual requirements
Thanks for your explanation. I understand what you are saying.
At first glance, the current IAM policies seem to allow operations from the VPC, but it actually operates to deny all actions. I thought it was confusing, but as you say, it might not be a problem as examples.
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
Description
Fixed misconfigured IAM policies in examples/complete
Motivation and Context
I created a VPC Endpoints based on examples/complete, but it did not work due to misconfigured IAM policies.
Breaking Changes
How Has This Been Tested?
examples/*
to demonstrate and validate my change(s)examples/*
projectspre-commit run -a
on my pull request