Closed q2w closed 3 months ago
/gcbrun
@q2w thx for the PR. Instead of updating existing example is it possible if you can add another module call which creates NEG? In this way we will keep testing both features of the module?
@q2w thx for the PR. Instead of updating existing example is it possible if you can add another module call which creates NEG? In this way we will keep testing both features of the module?
@imrannayer I have updated this PR with suggested changes. But before reviewing this PR, please have a look at this PR for fixing the test failure for this blueprint. Once the PR is merged i will rebase this PR.
@q2w thx for the PR. Instead of updating existing example is it possible if you can add another module call which creates NEG? In this way we will keep testing both features of the module?
@imrannayer I have updated this PR with suggested changes. But before reviewing this PR, please have a look at this PR for fixing the test failure for this blueprint. Once the PR is merged i will rebase this PR.
@imrannayer @bharathkkb The other PR is merged. Please review!
/gcbrun
/gcbrun
@imrannayer Please have a look!
Discussed with @imrannayer offline and lgtm to merge
This PR makes below changes,
serverless_neg_backends
. This field is used to configure serverless services like cloud-run, cloud-functions and app-engine as backend.google_compute_region_network_endpoint_group
for serverless services within the module itself.