Closed dallmair closed 2 years ago
There's one thing I'm not sure about with these new overloads. As you can see in the tests, TO_DATETIME(value, culture)
can be pretty handy in international contexts, so on one hand I'd like to see it in. On the other hand, I'd also see quite some value in TO_DATETIME(value, format)
such that we could write things like TO_DATETIME(value, 'yyyyMMdd')
, for example. But having both overloads is a bad idea as they would conflict (at least semantically) and therefore be confusing. Only solution I see is to give a different name to one of them, but I can't come up with a good name.
Thoughts? Ideas?
In SQL Server, there's also the PARSE
function that allows specifying a culture:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/parse-transact-sql
Here's a proposal for the culture-dependent built-in function discussion in #24.
First, all built-in functions should be invariant, including LOWER, UPPER, CHARINDEX, and FORMAT.
Second, new overloads for all culture-dependent function implementations allow users to request specific cultures explicitly. This even allows processing of input where some variable or table column data flows through the system in a different format than others do. Sample usage:
FORMAT(5, 'e', 'de-DE')
orTO_DECIMAL('5,0', 'de-DE')
Fixes #24.