In the current version we skip over/ignore nuclides of types LumpNuclideBase, NaturalNuclideBase, and DummyNuclideBase. This change adds support for lumped fission products and natural nuclide compositions and continues to ignore dummy nuclides (which I think is correct). It also adds support for metastable states of nuclides that was missing before. I did not realize before this that natural nuclides are being ignored, so it's important we get this into the plugin soon.
Natural nuclides I simply expand out to their constituent nuclides with nuclide.getNaturalIsotopics().
Lumped fission products I look up in the REFERENCE_LUMPED_FISSION_PRODUCT_FILE (armi/resources/referenceFissionProducts.dat).
I do have one question about the LFPs: I notice that the sum of densities of the nuclides for each LFP in the reference is 2, apparently indicating that each LFP nuclide is representing 2 real fission product nuclides. Does this mean that the total number density of the constituent nuclides is twice the number density of the LFP nuclide? This is the way I have it implemented now, but it's an easy fix if that's wrong.
In the current version we skip over/ignore nuclides of types
LumpNuclideBase
,NaturalNuclideBase
, andDummyNuclideBase
. This change adds support for lumped fission products and natural nuclide compositions and continues to ignore dummy nuclides (which I think is correct). It also adds support for metastable states of nuclides that was missing before. I did not realize before this that natural nuclides are being ignored, so it's important we get this into the plugin soon.Natural nuclides I simply expand out to their constituent nuclides with
nuclide.getNaturalIsotopics()
.Lumped fission products I look up in the
REFERENCE_LUMPED_FISSION_PRODUCT_FILE
(armi/resources/referenceFissionProducts.dat
).I do have one question about the LFPs: I notice that the sum of densities of the nuclides for each LFP in the reference is 2, apparently indicating that each LFP nuclide is representing 2 real fission product nuclides. Does this mean that the total number density of the constituent nuclides is twice the number density of the LFP nuclide? This is the way I have it implemented now, but it's an easy fix if that's wrong.