Open ericmjl opened 3 years ago
That seems reasonable to support. Not sure exactly when I'll get around to it, but I'll update this at that time.
I would really appreciate if this would become a reality as I feel my poor projects assaulted by too many config files at the root level. While I do not have a particular love for TOML format itself, I do like the idea of avoiding creation of yet another config file.
If you want darglint integrated with flake8 (which does not accept pyproject.toml) you can use https://github.com/csachs/pyproject-flake8 and then configure darglint via the [tool.flake8]
table.
Hi @terrencepreilly! Firstly, I wanted to chime in to say thank you for making
darglint
. It's a great addition to the ecosystem :smile:.Speaking of the ecosystem, I'm wondering if you might have considered allowing
darglint
to use apyproject.toml
file as the configuration file? This could be a nice thing to have, given that the Python world seems to be converging on it. On thepyjanitor
project, we do have apyproject.toml
file that houses configuration forblack
andinterrogate
, and in other projects I have housedisort
configuration in there too.No pressure to push things in this direction, I was just wondering if this might be on your roadmap, and thought of dropping in to ask. Please feel free to close the issue at your convenience too!