When a function features multiple Returns/Yields they cannot be individually mentioned in the docstring like Parameters would (see code example below).
def multiple_returns(a, b):
"""Multiple returns example.
Parameters
----------
a : int
First integer
b : int
Second integer
Returns
-------
diff : int
b subtracted from a
summation : int
b added to a
"""
diff = a - b
summation = a + b
return diff, summation
Instead darglint raises an error DAR000: Unexpected exception in darglint: Multiple types should be combined into a Union. The error message indicates that the Returns docstring should be structured something like:
Returns
-------
Union[int, int]
Tuple containing:
diff : int
b subtracted from a
summation : int
b added to a
"""
I don't think this is the neatest solution. Eventhough the return is a tuple, I would expect to be able to write a docstring for each individual returned variable. Can this functionality, like in the first example, be added (as an option) to darglint?
Sure, since it's part of the Numpy docstring spec. I haven't had time to update the numpy parser, but you're welcome to issue a pull request and I'll review it.
When a function features multiple Returns/Yields they cannot be individually mentioned in the docstring like Parameters would (see code example below).
Instead darglint raises an error
DAR000: Unexpected exception in darglint: Multiple types should be combined into a Union
. The error message indicates that the Returns docstring should be structured something like:I don't think this is the neatest solution. Eventhough the return is a tuple, I would expect to be able to write a docstring for each individual returned variable. Can this functionality, like in the first example, be added (as an option) to darglint?