Closed rakhimov closed 9 years ago
Hi @rakhimov , I've passed your test and added a few more. I did it for namespaces too.
What do you think about adding namespaces to the function names? useful or too noise?
I think it is a good idea for C++ code. For large codebase with multiple namespaces, it is helpful for reports to get the namespace attached to function names, i.e., namespace::class::function
.
This can be optional for small codebase.
I would suggest Lizard have a flag for this optional feature.
The name of the class is not attached to the operator overload. This is an example for #70