Closed tesk9 closed 4 years ago
I think I do like the "opaque" and "translucent" naming as suggested in https://github.com/tesk9/palette/issues/13#issuecomment-619300169 - so incorporating @BrianHicks' suggestion, maybe have Color.Opaque
and Color.Translucent
both exposing Color
? My only reservation there is that the Elm package web site only shows non-prefixed type names, so it wouldn't be immediately obvious from the signature of a function as shown on the package web site whether it accepted an Opaque.Color
or a Translucent.Color
.
For https://github.com/tesk9/palette/issues/13