ROS Buildfarm Release "Noetic and Foxy"

tesseract-robotics / tesseract

Motion Planning Environment

http://tesseract-docs.rtfd.io

Other

257 stars 89 forks source link

ROS Buildfarm Release "Noetic and Foxy" #521

Open Levi-Armstrong opened 3 years ago

Levi-Armstrong commented 3 years ago

Noetic:

[x] ros_industrial_cmake_boilerplate
[x] opw_kinematics
[x] osqp
[ ] osqp_eigen
[x] qpOASES
[ ] tesseract

Foxy

[ ] ros_industrial_cmake_boilerplate
[ ] opw_kinematics
[ ] osqp
[ ] osqp_eigen
[ ] qpOASES
[ ] tesseract

Levi-Armstrong commented 3 years ago

@mpowelson, @marip8 and @johnwason I believe this repository is ready to be released. Any objections to me releasing this repository for Noetic with tag 1.0.0?

johnwason commented 3 years ago

I am going to try a conda build tonight, let's make sure it will work there.

johnwason commented 3 years ago

No, it isn't building using conda on windows. I can't look into this until the week after next most likely. We can add patches later to the conda package if needed, or wait until the conda build is working.

marip8 commented 3 years ago

I'm on board for the release. As far as I can tell it looks like the major discussions about de-coupling the planning/visualization code have been addressed and there aren't any outstanding PRs with major changes.

What is your tagging strategy? Are the 0.x.x tags supposed to represent pre-release states and 1+.x.x represent post-release states? Just wondering if the next tag should be 0.3.0 since there really hasn't been a "major" change since the last tag

gavanderhoorn commented 3 years ago

What is your tagging strategy? Are the 0.x.x tags supposed to represent pre-release states and 1+.x.x represent post-release states? Just wondering if the next tag should be 0.3.0 since there really hasn't been a "major" change since the last tag

Going to 1.x immediately may indeed not be what you'd want.

If you're going to use semver, seeing a 1.x release implies quite a few things.

mpowelson commented 3 years ago

I think I agree that a 0.x release might be a better option right now. Then if that goes well we can plan on a 1.0 release sometime soon.

Levi-Armstrong commented 3 years ago

@gavanderhoorn, @mpowelson, @marip8 and @johnwason Thank you all for the input. I will begin the release process and use tag 0.4.0.

Levi-Armstrong commented 3 years ago

Just submitted the release on the ROS buildfarm.

Levi-Armstrong commented 3 years ago

@johnwason Everything has been upgraded to taskflow v3.0.0.

johnwason commented 3 years ago

@Levi-Armstrong ok I'll give the conda build another try

Levi-Armstrong commented 3 years ago

The release status can be tacked here.