Closed mpowelson closed 4 years ago
:+1: for benchmarking, but could this please not be called Benchmark
? That's a bit too generic -- and is already colliding with another poorly named package in my workspace ;)
Sure. How's google_benchmark?
Yes, much better.
Also seems to align somewhat better with REP-144.
I have been using the package name defined in rosdep key so things get built in the correct order. Does a key exist for google benchmark?
That would of course always be preferable.
Well it looks like the rosdep key is benchmark
shown here. Thoughts?
I didn't realize there was a debian. It would seem that we don't need this in that case.
Good point!
Wow, what a terrible name for a package.
Leave it to google to claim a regular noun for a C++ library name.
But yeah: if there is a binary and it's recent enough, it should be used.
Adds Google Benchmark for benchmarking key functions