testing-library / jest-dom

:owl: Custom jest matchers to test the state of the DOM
https://testing-library.com/docs/ecosystem-jest-dom
MIT License
4.41k stars 397 forks source link

toHaveStyle doesn't take account of CSS custom properties #280

Open thomaslombart opened 4 years ago

thomaslombart commented 4 years ago

Relevant code or config:

test.only('failing test', () => {
  const style = document.createElement('style')
  style.innerHTML = `
    div {
      --color: blue;
    }
  `

  const {container} = render(`
    <div>
      Hello world
    </div>
  `)

  document.body.appendChild(style)
  document.body.appendChild(container)

  expect(container).toHaveStyle(`--color: blue`)
})

Problem description:

If you were to run the test above, this would fail because toHaveStyle doesn't take account of CSS custom properties.

Suggested solution:

I think the PR #276 caused this behavior. Indeed, the isSubset function has been changed and doesn't use getPropertyValue anymore (see this line).

It seems a custom property on CSSStyleDeclaration can't be accessed simply using the property key (for example computedStyle['--color']), you explicitely have to use getPropertyValue.

I forked the repo and changed back the isSubset function to use getPropertyValue and things work well. That may be a solution (I assume there's a reason why it's been changed so things may not be so simple).

gnapse commented 4 years ago

Indeed, #276 was there for a reason, and unfortunately, we had not been covering in a test the support for these custom properties, which would've flagged this when it was introduced. The reason for #276, you can see it by checking #272, which is pretty serious and un-intuitive.

Anyway, we need to figure out how to support both use-cases. I may be able to dig into this soon, but I'll also mention here @just-boris who flagged #272 and authored the fix, because maybe they have an immediate understanding of what could be needed here.

just-boris commented 4 years ago

I see two possible options here:

  1. Bring back the getPropertyValue call, while keeping the property getter:
Object.entries(styles).every(
      ([prop, value]) =>
        computedStyle[prop] === value ||
        computedStyle.getPropertyValue(prop.toLowerCase()) === value,
    )
  1. Use only getPropertyValue and write a custom camelCase to dash-case converter, based on the following code: https://github.com/jsdom/cssstyle/blob/master/lib/parsers.js#L711-L722 (sadly, it is not exported)
gnapse commented 4 years ago

Option (1) seems reasonable enough without the extra overhead of the case converter.

gnapse commented 4 years ago

BTW @thomlom in the mean time, while this is resolved, you need not have a fork. You can fix the version in your package.json to the one prior to the release of that recent fix.

thomaslombart commented 4 years ago

Option 1 seems good to me too! Tests with a CSS custom property would need to be added of course.

@gnapse, sure! I didn't mean "forked" but "cloned" 😄

gnapse commented 4 years ago

:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 5.11.3 :tada:

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:

AshConnolly commented 2 years ago

@gnapse can we please get this issue reopened as it doesn't appear to have been resolved. see here - https://github.com/testing-library/jest-dom/issues/322#issuecomment-988212751 PR kindly opened by @hughes-ch here - https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom/pull/3299

gnapse commented 2 years ago

If the fix lies on jsdom, then the fix on our side is to merely update the jsdom dependency, right? Which, BTW, may require an update to the jsdom dependency in dom testing library.

Anyway, I'll open this for now to reflect this situation.

swese44 commented 1 year ago

Any update here? Thanks!

gnapse commented 1 year ago

Not yet. I wonder if updating the jsdom dependency could help. It is at v16.x here, and it could be taken to v20 like in dom-testing-library. I'll give it a try later, but no hard promises on the deadline. If someone wants to give it a try and ping me in the PR, I'll be happy to check it out.

Fullchee commented 8 months ago

Not ideal but the workaround I found (which might be helpful in figuring out the issue) was this

function App() {
  return <div style={{ "--my-property": 1 }}>Hello</div>;
}

expect(app.style._values).toMatchObject({
  "--my-property": "1", // string instead of a number
});

Reproducible repo with create react app (with the latest version of jest-dom)

(make sure to use Node 16+)