search

testpushpleaseignore / acquisition

GNU General Public License v3.0
25 stars 5 forks source link

Support for fractured mods #17

Closed aiolos01 closed 2 years ago

aiolos01 commented 2 years ago

Fractured mods are not shown at all on items.

testpushpleaseignore commented 2 years ago

Could you provide a screenshot of a mod that's not showing up? And is this a mod that's not showing up in the filter dropdown when pressing "Add mod", or is this a mod that you can see in-game, but not in Acquisition?

aiolos01 commented 2 years ago

I think it happens with every fractured mod. At least with every one I've tried. Here are several examples.

https://i.postimg.cc/SxNhPbvP/Snap271.png https://i.postimg.cc/59LbY3zs/Snap272.png https://i.postimg.cc/wTzHhmcg/Snap273.png https://i.postimg.cc/prbvc9wQ/Snap274.png https://i.postimg.cc/Hstm3kB5/Snap275.png https://i.postimg.cc/sxYrkjzk/Snap276.png

I don't see that list containing any fractured mods. Fractured mods are different that normal mods even if they have the same text.

testpushpleaseignore commented 2 years ago

Should have this fixed now in v0.9.3. Thanks!

aiolos01 commented 2 years ago

Works great, thanks for the quick fix.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:28 PM testpushpleaseignore < @.***> wrote:

Closed #17 https://github.com/testpushpleaseignore/acquisition/issues/17 as completed.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/testpushpleaseignore/acquisition/issues/17#event-6835002760, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSVXZM7XXB3FUDB6IOXDU3VP5KE3ANCNFSM5ZFKU42Q . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.*** com>

aiolos01 commented 2 years ago

Hello again, quick question. Is it normal for the database to be 2,5GB in size? I checked the previous version backups (had them since 0.5) in \AppData\Local\acquisition and they were a few MB in size. 0.91 was 200MB and 0.92 1,7GB. Now the data folder is 2,5GB. In contrast 0.7 for example was 18MB. I have a lot of items but 2,5GB seems excessive.

Thanks again

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 4:09 PM Nikos Papadopoulos @.***> wrote:

Works great, thanks for the quick fix.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:28 PM testpushpleaseignore < @.***> wrote:

Closed #17 https://github.com/testpushpleaseignore/acquisition/issues/17 as completed.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/testpushpleaseignore/acquisition/issues/17#event-6835002760, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSVXZM7XXB3FUDB6IOXDU3VP5KE3ANCNFSM5ZFKU42Q . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.*** com>

testpushpleaseignore commented 2 years ago

@aiolos01 Could you provide some additional info in #18 for me? I think that there might be some old data sticking around in the items table of that database, but can't seem to be able to reproduce the problem myself yet.