The service deployed on Linux has installed google browser on Linux. The execution times are incorrect.
Unable to create a new Test Session due to unexpected failure(0x537). Please contact Support for more details. - unknown error: Chrome failed to start: exited abnormally. (unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist) (The process started from chrome location /usr/bin/google-chrome is no longer running, so ChromeDriver is assuming that Chrome has crashed.) Build info: version: '3.141.59', revision: 'e82be7d358', time: '2018-11-14T08:17:03' System info: host: 'program', ip: '127.0.0.1', os.name: 'Linux', os.arch: 'amd64', os.version: '3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7.x86_64', java.version: '11.0.14.1' Driver info: driver.version: TestsigmaDriver remote stacktrace: #0 0x559f5d54d303 #1 0x559f5d321d37 #2 0x559f5d34a157 #3 0x559f5d346330 #4 0x559f5d3874a6 #5 0x559f5d37e753 #6 0x559f5d351a14 #7 0x559f5d352b7e #8 0x559f5d59c32e #9 0x559f5d59fc0e #10 0x559f5d582610 #11 0x559f5d5a0c23 ...
Is there an existing issue for this?
What is the current behavior?
The service deployed on Linux has installed google browser on Linux. The execution times are incorrect.
Unable to create a new Test Session due to unexpected failure(0x537). Please contact Support for more details. - unknown error: Chrome failed to start: exited abnormally. (unknown error: DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist) (The process started from chrome location /usr/bin/google-chrome is no longer running, so ChromeDriver is assuming that Chrome has crashed.) Build info: version: '3.141.59', revision: 'e82be7d358', time: '2018-11-14T08:17:03' System info: host: 'program', ip: '127.0.0.1', os.name: 'Linux', os.arch: 'amd64', os.version: '3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7.x86_64', java.version: '11.0.14.1' Driver info: driver.version: TestsigmaDriver remote stacktrace: #0 0x559f5d54d303 #1 0x559f5d321d37 #2 0x559f5d34a157 #3 0x559f5d346330 #4 0x559f5d3874a6 #5 0x559f5d37e753 #6 0x559f5d351a14 #7 0x559f5d352b7e #8 0x559f5d59c32e #9 0x559f5d59fc0e #10 0x559f5d582610 #11 0x559f5d5a0c23 ...
What is the expected behavior?
Hope to be normal
Steps To Reproduce
1.Recording procedure 2.Run test
Version
Testsigma Community Edition