The DCO ontology has a Proceedings class, but VIVO already uses the bibo:Proceedings class.
dco:Proceedings
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Proceedings"@en-US ;
rdfs:subClassOf bibo:Collection ;
rdfs:comment """
A collection of academic papers published in the context of an academic conference
"""^^rdf:XMLLiteral .
dco:Proceedings is not a subclass of bibo:Proceedings. The two classes have have same description.
Should we remove dco:Proceedings and use bibo:Proceedings ?
@olyerickson Including John to see if he recalls the reason for creating dco:Proceedings, which is a sub class of bibo:Collection, vs bibo:Proceedings which is a sub class of bibo:Book
@xgmachina @mrpatrickwest
The DCO ontology has a Proceedings class, but VIVO already uses the
bibo:Proceedings
class.dco:Proceedings
is not a subclass ofbibo:Proceedings
. The two classes have have same description.Should we remove
dco:Proceedings
and usebibo:Proceedings
?