When ingesting tables the assumption is made that the data is of type double, however in the file https://github.com/tetherless-world/nanomine-graph/blob/rheometer_tests/tests/xml/L199_S1_Duncan_2010.xml the dependent variable is specified as a range, e.g. 0-199, as though it is bins of a histogram. While it is ingesting this and labeling it as an XSD:Double, it clearly isn't and I wouldn't be surprised to see this lead to issue down the road in the visualization of data.
When ingesting tables the assumption is made that the data is of type double, however in the file https://github.com/tetherless-world/nanomine-graph/blob/rheometer_tests/tests/xml/L199_S1_Duncan_2010.xml the dependent variable is specified as a range, e.g. 0-199, as though it is bins of a histogram. While it is ingesting this and labeling it as an XSD:Double, it clearly isn't and I wouldn't be surprised to see this lead to issue down the road in the visualization of data.
This particular table is tested by https://github.com/tetherless-world/nanomine-graph/blob/rheometer_tests/tests/test_L199_S1_Duncan_2010.py, and the casting of the range to a double is also shown in this file.