Open mdeagen opened 4 years ago
Correction: Legacy DC conductivity data are still stored as nm:ElectricConductivity
.
The following SPARQL query achieves expected results:
PREFIX nm: <http://nanomine.org/ns/>
PREFIX sio: <http://semanticscience.org/resource/>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX dct: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>
SELECT DISTINCT * WHERE {
?sample a nm:PolymerNanocomposite ;
sio:hasAttribute [ a nm:ElectricConductivity ;
sio:hasValue ?Conductivity ;
sio:hasUnit [ rdfs:label ?unit ]
] .
?control sio:hasRole [ a sio:ControlRole ;
sio:inRelationTo ?sample ] ;
sio:hasAttribute [ a nm:ElectricConductivity ;
sio:hasValue ?controlConductivity ;
sio:hasUnit [ rdfs:label ?unit ]
] .
?sample a nm:PolymerNanocomposite ;
sio:hasComponentPart [ a [ rdfs:label ?Filler ];
sio:hasRole [ a nm:Filler ] ;
sio:hasAttribute [ a nm:MassFraction ;
sio:hasValue ?Loading_mass ]
] ,
[ a [ rdfs:label ?Matrix ];
sio:hasRole [ a nm:Matrix] ] .
}
The nm:ElectricConductivity
and nm:ElectricalConductivity
representations still should be unified, in addition to specifying AC or DC measurement conditions.
Electrical conductivity is measured under DC or AC field conditions. If DC, only a voltage is provided. If AC, voltage (peak or RMS) is provided along with frequency.
Previously, the
sio:Attribute nm:ElectricalConductivity
stored what appeared to be DC conductivity values. A plot based on this search result looked like this.Now,
nm:ElectricalConductivity
seems to return AC conductivity values. This is what the plot now looks like this (only 1000 of 9000+ rows included here due to filesize limitations)Note: An earlier version of the ontology spelled the term as
nm:ElectricConductivity
. The term appears to have been corrected tonm:ElectricalConductivity
. However, the Ontology Spreadsheet still has a reference tonm:ElectricConductivity
.The main questions are:
Below is the SPARQL query that previously would have returned DC conductivity values, but now returns AC conductivity values: