Open DavidHaslam opened 6 years ago
Yes, tagging at the verse level would improve this a lot.
Ezekiel 48:1 has one reference repeated six times!
\v 1 La-ke ngamabizo ezizwe\x + 48.23; 45.8.\x*. Kusukela ekucineni kwasenyakatho\x + 47.15,16,17.\x*, kuze kube seceleni\x + 2 Sam. 18.4; Josh. 15.46.\x* kwendlela yeHethiloni\x + 47.15,16,17.\x*, ekungeneni kweHamathi\x + 47.15,16,17.\x*, iHazari-Enani\x + 47.15,16,17.\x*, umngcele weDamaseko\x + 47.15,16,17.\x* ngasenyakatho, kuze kube seceleni\x + 2 Sam. 18.4; Josh. 15.46.\x* kweHamathi\x + 47.15,16,17.\x*; ngoba \add lezi\add* zinhlangothi zakhe empumalanga \add l\add*entshonalanga, \add isabelo\add* esisodwa \add sika\add*Dani\x + Nani 2.25-31.\x*.
Six times, whoops!
See also issue #22
There are many verses that contain the same cross-reference in more than one place, tagged against different words. IMHO, this is somewhat OTT.
It's the kind of thing that would not happen if xrefs were tagged at verse level instead of word level.