Closed DavidHaslam closed 7 years ago
The fourth line has a further problem.
001 \x + 11.23. 18.10. 11. 23. 18. 10.\x*
It appears that the two references are duplicated in the second half, but with a space after the ch.vs separators.
Here's the context for this one. Joshua 12:7 reads:
\v 7 Zvino awa madzimambo enyika Joshua nevana vaIsraeri yavakarova mhiri kwaJoridhani kumavirazuva, kubva paBhaari-Gadhi mumupata weRebhanoni, kusvika pagomo reHaraki\x + 11.17.\x* rinokwira kuSeiri\x + 11.17.\x*; Joshua yaakapa kumarudzi aIsraeri kuva nhaka zvichienderana nekuparadzaniswa kwavo\x + 11.23. 18.10. 11. 23. 18. 10.\x*.
These two xrefs would be identical were it not for the spurious space in the first one.
001 \x + 12.1,10,26. Ezi. 2.2,36. 3.2,8. 5.2. Ezi. 3. 2.\x*
001 \x + 12.1,10,26. Ezi. 2.2,36. 3.2,8. 5.2. Ezi. 3.2.\x*
Here's another pair:
001 \x + 17.4. 1 Madz. 22. 8.\x*
001 \x + 17.4. 1 Madz. 22.8.\x*
and another (with multiple counts):
002 \x + 20.11,21,22,31,32,40,41,43. 22.2,3,4. 2 Madz. 5.6,7,8. 6. 9.\x*
004 \x + 20.11,21,22,31,32,40,41,43. 22.2,3,4. 2 Madz. 5.6,7,8. 6.9.\x*
and another:
001 \x + 28.19. 31.24. Map. 45.9. Isa. 13.12. Zvir. 25.12. Marir. 4.1. Dhan. 10. 5.\x*
001 \x + 28.19. 31.24. Map. 45.9. Isa. 13.12. Zvir. 25.12. Marir. 4.1. Dhan. 10.5.\x*
and another:
001 \x + Neh. 2. 1.\x*
002 \x + Neh. 2.1.\x*
xrefs are to be removed.
The attached file is a counted list of xrefs that match the PCRE "
\d+\. \d+[[:punct:]]\D
" anywhere in the line.merged.xrefs.search.txt
There are at least 56 xrefs like this.
The extra space makes it difficult to parse the reference, and may in some cases be ambiguous.
NB. One line in the results has a count of 2.
002 \x + 20.11,21,22,31,32,40,41,43. 22.2,3,4. 2 Madz. 5.6,7,8. 6. 9.\x*