Closed dbitouze closed 2 years ago
there seem to miss more declared length definitions.
there seem to miss more declared length definitions.
And they shouldn't be all blindly proposed for all the lengths.
txs classifies length, it does not distinguish between height and width. Assuming that the user has a basic idea what he/she is doing, they can select the correct one from a list of 4 entries.
added textwidth and made columnwidth more easily accessible. (More lengths are available under "all" tab)
txs classifies length, it does not distinguish between height and width. Assuming that the user has a basic idea what he/she is doing, they can select the correct one from a list of 4 entries.
Why not something like:
width=#\linewidth,\textwidth,\columnwidth,\paperwidth
height=#\textheight,\paperheight
totalheight=#\textheight,\paperheight
instead of the blind:
width=##L
height=##L
totalheight=##L
inflexible solution. People may want to define their own lengths ... And there are more places where width can be set, should we go through all of them. Again, adults can chose from four options, not worth the effort.
Environment
Description
The
graphicx.cwl
file contains the following lines:Hence, in
\includegraphics[keyvals]{imagefile}
, the completions of bothwidth=
andheight=
are both\linewidth
and\textheight
.IMO, except maybe in the case of rotated images:
\textheight
is a bit odd forwidth
,\linewidth
is a bit odd forheight
(and fortotalheight
).