Closed sanderpick closed 4 years ago
@Gozala how would you imagine referring to the "branches"? Do they get their own name / priority?
how would you imagine referring to the "branches"?
Is that question about name itself ? I have being using term “branch” that I don’t particularly favor but do find it helpful due to git analogy. Only other term I can think of are “channel” and “pointer”. I’m absolutely open to alternatives, it’s more important in my opinion to have n:1 relationship with logs.
Do they get their own name / priority?
Name as in cryptographic key yes. Priority I don’t think so. I don’t feel like it would make sense to prescribe what multiple identifiers should be used for. Maybe they won’t be, but if log key and identifier is the same key then it can’t be, which in my experience could be a pretty inconvenient
Working on this one tomorrow.
Proposal for discussion here #62
Closing this in favour of discussion on #62.
From @Gozala