Closed elia closed 9 years ago
@sorbits hate to bug you, but any reason why this can't be merged – would clear up two other pull requests that have been lingering.
This is my fault, I've been working to improve this and #58 to try to improve the scoping of the items. The string scope for this seems improper to me so I've been trying to come up with a succinct way to have rules to mark them up with individual scopes but I think that's impossible so I'll need to just make numerous rules to match each version and type, it will end up being verbose but will better match the various types.
@infininight IMO something should be merged and then refined, I don't think people will notice if for a couple months the scope names are suboptimal — of course this doesn't stand if you're about to release the complete solution
Thanks @infininight. It's been over a year, might as well take the time to feel good about the solution.
Sure thing :)
@infininight bump
Added in a different manner in a6a17019df8899528485e5d500be2dbf94dafc61.
As a heads-up, Symbol percent-strings are also added by #44, #58