Closed gkaracha closed 3 years ago
Not sure how to keep the tests for the continuous curve (1adefcd) around, but I opened #284 since this seems to be a more general issue we have to address while making progress towards addressing #171.
The continuous curve does not seem to break the e2e tests (see here: https://github.com/tezos-checker/checker/pull/283/commits/215b71adc430fdfb4a30dbc98b6e7f6c569b34ec) so it looks like it is a viable replacement for our current curve, yay!
Gas costs: No change. Entrypoint sizes: No change. Test coverage: No change.
LGTM! I'm happy landing this and addressing the question of testing separately since it is a bit of a broader dilemma.
Great, thanks! When we find a way to address #284 in general, I'll happily cherry-pick 1adefcd :smile:
Continuation of #281, and the last part of addressing #261.
Remaining TODOs:
src/continuousDriftDerivative.ml
into a jinja template.checker.yaml
.