Closed tfausak closed 9 years ago
One problem with this approach is that <|
doesn't behave like you might expect.
f x y z
x |> f <| y <| z -- Wrong!
Since <|
is meant to represent right-to-left pipelines, it doesn't work well with multiple arguments.
h (g (f x))
h <| g <| f <| x
@tonyday567 are you interested in this pull request?
Hi tf, I see what you mean, but I don't work well with multiple arguments either ;)
I'd say that this precedence is marginally better, but don't consider my opinion well-thought.
I agree that it's marginally better. I'm not sure if it's worth adding this or not.
Leave it out then, IMO. I think the best path for this library is to maintain design clarity, and be ruthless about scope creep.
:+1: I think that's a good goal for any library.
Fixes #3.