Open giuliov opened 5 years ago
Its seems the issue here is secure storage am I correct?
Yes (currently PAT is saved in the Function configuration), and more: ideally the Function instance should be perpetually connected, removing the hassle of manually refreshing expiring tokens.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
@giuliov please correct me if I am going into wrong direction: Is this about these 2 topics?
1) storage location of secrets (PAT)
2) support additional login possibilities
@BobSilent it is more 2b in order to avoid managing PAT I explored the topic a while ago, but I was only able to find solutions for:
The ideal solution would be similar to registering a build agent: you authenticate once then some kind of token is exchanged and the agent is trusted.
PS you can use Slack for chatting and discussion.
Current version has only support for PAT, which can last, at most, a year.