Closed lorenzschmid closed 8 months ago
If #24 is merged first, this PR has to be updated.
I am ok but can we use a name more explicit than virtual
, something like no-io
or no-port
?
At CERN, RF was using virtual in an old system to mean no register at all...
You are right, a virtual
register is probably better describing a register, which does not actually exist in hardware.
How about closed
, isolated
, or unconnected
register? Otherwise, I would also be fine with no-port
. Let me know what you prefer.
I am not sure what closed
or isolated
refer to. Those registers are still connected to the bus, right ? (This also makes unconnected
sound weird).
How about no-wire
?
(Sorry for not being enthusiastic with your names!)
No worries at all :) Of all proposals I like your original no-port
best. Would that be fine with you?
yes, that's ok.
Thanks, I just updated this PR and the code to call it no-port
.
Thanks!
Add a new
x-hdl.type
no-port
: Such register act like a small memory element having no input or output port.