Open melezhik opened 11 years ago
I like it. Do you think we should continue to support the -L
and -l
shortcuts that we have now? Or will you have to use the --cpanm-options
to set those?
Do you think we should continue to support the -L and -l shortcuts that we have now? Or will you have to use the --cpanm-options to set those?
this is good question ... I think it's good to leave pinto install -L|-l
. As for me when I think about pinto install
command firstly I think about installing something into given install-base (then I add -l
or -L
bits) ... and then I adjust the behavior of install process (if it be more verbose?, or to use curl as http client? or something ... ) - and I add cpanm options (with --cpanm-options
string). I'd say that -L and -l shortcuts in someway cpan client agnostic on pinto install
side ... of course one can use --cpanm-options
to setup install base directly but IMHO it's less natural when installing with pinto install
Right now to add cpanminus options into
pinto install command
one should say something like that:I'd like to propose alternative or substitution for the given format:
IMHO, this way is more convenient because it passes cpanm options as is, without a bit confusion subtraction of dash symbols.