Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Thats right, what about if we merge plugins with the dataSource,
so it should be treated as a source, a user can activate or deactivate the
plugin when they wanted.
What's your thought.
Original comment by DevBinn...@gmail.com
on 11 May 2012 at 12:32
Doesn't that mean that every datasource needs its own plugin? Though
datasources are connected to plugins. It currently works like this:
There are dataselector plugins, that can return a datasource, or the user can
add its own datasources in the arrays.xml, or through the mixare app.
There are also marker and datahandler plugins, they work together. The
datahandler plugin checks if the url of the datasource, or the content of the
datasource matches its criteria. If they match, then the datahandler will
process that datasource and creates the markers.
This way, the plugins are only activated, when they are used.
I think its better if I write a technical documentation about this, so that
everyone can discuss about this structure (issue116).
Original comment by abdu.e...@gmail.com
on 11 May 2012 at 10:09
I see what you mean. I'll take a look at it and see what we can do about it.
In the mean time, and for such expanding project, I would HIGHLY recommend
documenting newly created classes as it helps the developer who created them
and the new comers.
Original comment by DevBinn...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 7:14
I totally agree with you about that. For that reason I created issue116.
Original comment by abdu.e...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 10:01
Original comment by abdu.e...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 8:28
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
abdu.e...@gmail.com
on 9 May 2012 at 12:55