Add CherryPy framework

[murilobr]

• Language : python
• Repo : https://github.com/cherrypy/cherrypy
• Author :

[waghanza]

Hi @webknjaz,

Would you mind to add (or consent that we add) cherrypy in here ?

This project compare performance based on 3 routes :

• GET /, SHOULD return a successful status code and an empty string
• GET /user/:id, SHOULD return a successful status code and the id
• POST /user, SHOULD return a successful status code and an empty string

Regards,

[murilobr]

I would like that you add.

[webknjaz]

@waghanza I don't mind. But I'm not an original author. I'm an active maintainer, though.

@murilobr feel free to ping me for review.

[waghanza]

@webknjaz Could you ping the original author (need to have consent, or at least a non opposition)

[webknjaz]

He is no longer active in the community. But you can try emailing him @ remi {AT} cherrypy {DOT} org. FWIW there's not much code in the repo that has survived from those times. It's been over a decade.

[waghanza]

@webknjaz I understand. I just want not to add any friction in cherrypy community :heart:

[Lawouach]

Indeed. Rémi will see no issue here and has left the project years ago. No need to reach out I'd say :)

[Lawouach]

Please could you stop spamming the mailing list however. There is no need for it.

[waghanza]

Oops, sorry. The web interface said there was an error, sorry for this mis-adventure.

@Lawouach No objection that we add cherrypy here ?

[Lawouach]

No worries. Messages are pending review when it's your first message.

I have none but @webknjaz is better suited to answer as he is a current maintainer. I was a long time ago :)

[waghanza]

@webknjaz Thanks for approval

@murilobr Any PR will be :heart:

[murilobr]

@waghanza I will try to do something. No time those days, but I will try. Thanks for your effort.

[murilobr]

@webknjaz could you please check this implementation? https://github.com/murilobr/web-frameworks/tree/cherrypy/python/cherrypy

@waghanza Could you check if it is according to the rules?

[waghanza]

Hi @murilobr,

Could you make a PR ? so as we can focus on what to fix

btw, thanks for participating

[webknjaz]

I'd prefer to work with a PR view as I would be able to comment on specific lines.

[webknjaz]

P.S. Why do you use gunicorn?

[murilobr]

P.S. Why do you use gunicorn?

Because other implementations in this project are using it.

I will create the PR.

[webknjaz]

Because other implementations in this project are using it.

Is it required by some policy? I'm just trying to figure out what is it being benchmarked.

[murilobr]

Because other implementations in this project are using it.

Is it required by some policy? I'm just trying to figure out what is it being benchmarked.

No there isn't. I think that we just have to use the most performatic implementation and I just used gunicorn because the majority of the python projects in this are using it. If you want you can change or suggest a better implementation.

[webknjaz]

There's no such thing as better or worse. But it cheats the benchmark in a way.