Closed Bagu closed 1 year ago
An other test shown as "acceptable" :
X-hMailServer-Envelope-From: emddaspfz@mega.nz
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 at Sat, 05 Aug 2023 16:13:15 +0200
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: ****************************
X-Spam-Status: 28.7
X-Spam-Bar: ****************************
X-Spam-X-hMailServer-Reason-Score: 28.7
X-Spam-Info: 28.7/5.0, autolearn=no autolearn_force=no, shortcircuit=_SC_, bayes=1.0000
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
* [82.157.63.105 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
* 3.3 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
* [82.157.63.105 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
* 0.0 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail)
* [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=emddaspfz%40mega.nz;ip=82.157.63.105;r=wwwbagubiz]
* 0.0 SPF_HELO_FAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (fail)
* [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=helo;id=mega.nz;ip=82.157.63.105;r=wwwbagubiz]
* 3.0 DMARC_REJECT DMARC reject policy
* 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
* Alignment
* 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* 3.1 MSGID_SPAM_CAPS Spam tool Message-Id: (caps variant)
* 1.4 MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary
* 1.8 BOTNET_NORDNS Relay's IP address has no PTR record
* [botnet_nordns,ip=82.157.63.105]
* 1.5 BOTNET Relay might be a spambot or virusbot
* [botnet0.9,ip=82.157.63.105,maildomain=mega.nz,nordns]
* 3.2 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received: date
* 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
* [emddaspfz(at)mega.nz]
* 1.1 RCVD_IN_SPAMDONKEY_L5 RBL: Sender listed in SpamDonkey Level-5
* [82.157.63.105 listed in dnsbl.spamdonkey.com]
* 1.5 T_LOCAL_UNAUTHUNSEC Score on unauthenticated unsecure connections
* 1.9 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE
* -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available.
* 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
* 0.8 T_LOCAL_RCVD_MISMATCH EHLO/HELO Mismatch
* 0.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available.
* 1.3 MSMAIL_PRI_ABNORMAL Email priority often abused
* 0.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS From SPOOFED_FREEMAIL and no rDNS
* 0.0 XPRIO Has X-Priority header
I have no idea why, but the headers you show are corrupted. Although both say "SpamAssassin 4.0.0", the headers are completely different.
For example:
X-Spam-Status: 18.8/5.0, ...
vs
X-Spam-Info: 28.7/5.0, ...
So i've made some changes that might work
Describe the bug I have a spam score mark as acceptable even if i have this in header :
Expected behavior Have a correct spam score or a way to tell snappy witch header to use for spam score detection
Please complete the following information: