Open Mikaela opened 9 months ago
Am I right in clarifying that the problem is that you want to exclude one, or a very few number of existing bans from ebl
but otherwise want all their policies to be directly applied by Draupnir automatically?
Yes. If I didn't want the majority of entries applied, I wouldn't have subscribed the list.
I thought there was an issue about this already, but as not, I will open one.
Fluffynator is subscribed to banlists
fluffy
,cme-bans
andEBL
.ebl
recently banned@anti-scam:matrix.org
for a reasonnot needed bot
, while I would still like to benefit from it pinging for mod attention when there is something suspicious going on as I cannot monitor the rooms 24/7.I think this might need a different type of allowing users unless
"org.matrix.mjolnir.allow
just works and ability to prioritise policy lists over each other.As a not-coder I think a simple way of sorting would be looking at the bots PL in the rooms, which would mean
fluffy
leads by priority 100, followed by cme-bans with priority 50 (I didn't check) and at last ebl by priority 0. In the future more flexible controls would likely be desirable.