Open TheArcaneBrony opened 2 months ago
Maybe it would make more sense to have an issue for banning bridged users?
I'm not sure how you'd reliably detect those?
The same way that you're doing here?
I had a basic configurable glob/regex thing in mind
The point is that the glob/regex is the way to ban them, it's not the ban of a bridged user itself. If you want to record that then we need something else.
So like idk how telegram works but we could have something like this:
me.marewolf.draupnir.rule.telegram_user
{ "entity": "<their-telegram-id>" }
Then the glob rule can be derived from that
Story: I want to avoid writing rules to banlists that match a given pattern. It happens from time to time that a moderator writes a rule for a bridged user without wildcarding the domain, so i'd like to prevent or rewrite rules matching .eg
@telegram_12345:myserver.xyz
to@telegram_12345:*