The row numbering is incorrect in the trace output when each flow row is started. Issue was introduced with implementation of macros, and is likely related to the case now where first command in sequence may not be a FLOW command that positions the legs. (i.e. a BOM command instead.) Code has to skip ahead until it finds leg movement to get the frame building process working, and this confuses the row numbers in traces.
The row numbering is incorrect in the trace output when each flow row is started. Issue was introduced with implementation of macros, and is likely related to the case now where first command in sequence may not be a FLOW command that positions the legs. (i.e. a BOM command instead.) Code has to skip ahead until it finds leg movement to get the frame building process working, and this confuses the row numbers in traces.