Open killakalle opened 4 years ago
PS: At first, my structure of nodes was like this:
area, type: Artificial area | Boulder 1, type: Boulder | Boulder 2, type: Boulder
I then changed the types to :
area, type: Artificial area | Boulder 1, type: Artificial area | Boulder 2, type: Artificial area
But it did not have any impact on the search results. Wondering though, whether Children of an artificial area are automatically considered artifical
or not.
PPS: Issue maybe related to https://github.com/theCrag/website/issues/2998 ?
confirmed issue, i remember something similar somewhere else, with public artificial boulders, and issue with the artificial search only finding things below a Gym node. I thought that had been corrected already. Will search for the older topic and see where it stands.
found it : #2579 and this area. https://www.thecrag.com/climbing/australia/inner-melbourne/area/982344321 They got around it by setting the higher level as a Gym instead of artificial area, which should not be required.
What happened? Filtering routes with
setting
:Artificial
does not return routes in artificial areas. They are found underNatual
setting instead.Example URL(s) to reproduce the problem:
Filter: https://www.thecrag.com/climbing/spain/valencia-cuenca-area/area/2912893242/routes/in-setting/artificial/?sortby=at,desc
Artificial area with routes that are not returned by the filter: https://www.thecrag.com/climbing/spain/valencia-cuenca-area/area/3067857549
Ideally, also provide screenshots: No artificial routes are found:![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/30682796/82847084-6f992780-9eec-11ea-9624-edd8de47579a.png)
Instead, artificial routes show up under![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/30682796/82846955-a589dc00-9eeb-11ea-8b47-913c6cf9c28e.png)
Natural
searchWhat you expected: