Closed eirini-zormpa closed 10 months ago
apologies for the shenanigans with the assignees! I for some reason am only able to assign up to one person, which is weird!
Generally as long as there is attribution I think either is fine. Any material diffs between CC BY and MIT? I found this https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/6392/
I'll email some relevant folks for advice
updating to add info from DPO that CC-BY or CC-BY-SA should be okay!
Final update is that we should be using CC BY-NC-SA
@all-contributors please add @eirini-zormpa for doc
@eirini-zormpa
I've put up a pull request to add @eirini-zormpa! :tada:
What licence would we like to use to release the code? My usual go-to is the Creative Commons Attribution licence which allows people to do whatever they want as long as they cite us.
Generally, Creative Commons aren't ideal for software, but I think the reasons for that aren't hugely applicable to scripts such as this. I think there's a semantics conversation to be had here 😅
But, there are also software-specific licences we could use (e.g. the MIT licence) which have basically the same restrictions.
What are your thoughts?
(I also just assumed that that's the level of restriction we'd go for, but I could be wrong!)