Closed krytarowski closed 8 years ago
Tbh I don't care. LGPL2+ and MPL1.1 sounds good. I don't need compatibility with GPL (obviously), so MPL 1.1 sounds good, too. However if you need MPL2.0 for some reason, I am fine with this, too. I will update the informations in the README the next days. I didn't tinker with licenses for a long time. These days I choose just GPL2+ for most new projects.
I'm ok with LGPL+
, so any LGPL (2.0, 2.1, 3.0 or later). This wasn't explicitly set. Please add a note about it.
This is what I used in the pkgsrc package http://pkgsrc.se/textproc/aha
For Debian I assumed "MPL 1.1 or LGPL-3+". But I'm fine with any of the mentioned licenses if it makes the licensing clearer. :-)
LGPL2+ does include LGPL3+, so you don't need to change anything @xtaran, do you?
I do have to change that if you go with LGPL2+, but that's no reason to not choose LGPL2+.
MPL-1.1 or what version of LGPL? Any?
Thank you