Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I recently noticed this too. Here's a patch with a single unit test added. (More
however would not be a bad idea.)
In addition to the above noted fix there are two other small changes.
Also "make test" in the source was not working because in this line
test: @echo
there should be a line break. And while I was in that section I added a "check"
target as sort of an alias for "test". (GNU automake uses "make check" instead
of
"make test".
Original comment by rocky.bernstein
on 27 Sep 2008 at 9:54
Attachments:
Hi Rocky,
I'm not sure what I need to do with assert-output.diff
I tried:
patch shunit2 < assert-output.diff
but got:
Processing... I cannot find a patch in there anywhere.
Is there another patch-like utility I should be using? Do I need to split up
the file assert-output.diff and patch using just one part of it?
Regards, Mal.
Original comment by malcolm....@gmail.com
on 3 Oct 2008 at 4:34
Works for me
$ cd ...shunit2/trunk/source/2.1
$ patch -p0 < ~/Desktop/assert-output.diff
patching file src/shell/shunit2.
...
$ patch --version
patch 2.5.9
Copyright (C) 1988 Larry Wall
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
You may redistribute copies of this program
under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING
If this is not the version of that your are using get it from
ftp://ftp.gnu.org:/pub/gnu/patch/patch-2.5.4.tar.gz
If you can't do that, edit the file:
--- src/shell/shunit2 (revision 226)
+++ src/shell/shunit2 (working copy)
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
[ -z "${shunit_message_:-}" ] && shunit_message_=''
if [ $# -eq 3 ]; then
- shunit_message_="${shunit_message_}$1"
+ shunit_message_="$1"
shift
fi
shunit_expected_=$1
And look for a line like the one that has - in it and change it to a
line like the one that has + in it.
Good luck.
Original comment by rocky.bernstein
on 3 Oct 2008 at 7:15
The provided patch is only a hack to fix a larger problem, one that stems from
the _SHUNIT_LINENO_ macro. I'm
looking into it.
Original comment by kate.a.w...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2008 at 10:25
Ah, actually it stems from the fact that when assertEquals fails, it calls
failNotEqual, which itself extends the
shunit_message_ variable yet again with the same information. Now, how to fix...
Original comment by kate.a.w...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2008 at 10:44
Fixed in rev# 230.
Original comment by kate.a.w...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2008 at 11:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
malcolm....@gmail.com
on 17 Sep 2008 at 3:36