search

thecocce / fog

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/fog
0 stars 0 forks source link

Doxygen process is not portable #26

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. doxygen Doxygen

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
sh: C:/Program Files/HTML Help Workshop/hhc.exe: not found

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
svn r623 / Debian GNU/Linux

Please provide any additional information below.
− Doxygen should be renamed to Doxyfile (since it is the standard naming 
scheme). Nothing is wrong but the fact that the configuration file is named 
Doxygen is just… disapointing. More over, the file permissions on GNU/Linux 
are not set correctly on that file (to be verified). exec bits must be set to 0.
− Since Fog aims to be portable, the doxygen process should be. chm is not 
portable and should be excluded de facto from the doc generation process.
− I suggest to include the doxygen processing to the build process.

Best regards,

Renaud

Original issue reported on code.google.com by renaud.a...@gmail.com on 24 Mar 2011 at 7:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Accepted,

although I don't agree with inclusion of doxygen to the build process.

Thank you!

Original comment by kobalicek.petr on 24 Mar 2011 at 8:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Even if it's optional?

Original comment by renaud.a...@gmail.com on 24 Mar 2011 at 8:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
You know how to make it optional?

Original comment by kobalicek.petr on 24 Mar 2011 at 8:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
find_package(Doxygen)

configure_file(Doxyfile Doxyfile COPYONLY)
add_custom_target(doxygen ${DOXYGEN_EXECUTABLE} 
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/Doxyfile)

make does not build the documentation. make doxygen does.

[Partly OT] Check this interesting one: 
http://snikt.net/index.php/2010/04/01/howto-use-cmake-with-cc-projects.

Original comment by renaud.a...@gmail.com on 24 Mar 2011 at 9:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I forgot to mention that I've tested that with cmake 2.8.

Original comment by renaud.a...@gmail.com on 24 Mar 2011 at 9:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
This seems to be okay:)

Original comment by kobalicek.petr on 25 Mar 2011 at 1:07