Now that the paper is public on biorxiv I think it would be good to make the steps to run the analyses more consistent.
My understanding is that right now:
Synthetic data runs completely on main notebook, including its plots.
Hyperparameters runs and plots on a separate notebook
EEG data analysis runs on separated scripts, and then the final plots are done on the main notebook
MEG data analysis does something similar as EEG
Given this, should we try to make it more consistent so that the instructions for reproducing the results are less complicated? Also would be a nice opportunity to make sure that the results stay the same (although I understanding rerunning meg may not be possible?)
In any case, what should the structure be?
Making the pickle objects in separate scripts/notebooks and then doing the plots on the main notebooks?
Separating every "dataset" into its own notebook/script. That is,no longer having a main notebook, but 4: synthetic, hyperparameters, eeg, meg. Each doing their self-contained pickles and plots
Keep things heterogenous as it is right now, just some minor cleaning?
Now that the paper is public on biorxiv I think it would be good to make the steps to run the analyses more consistent.
My understanding is that right now:
Given this, should we try to make it more consistent so that the instructions for reproducing the results are less complicated? Also would be a nice opportunity to make sure that the results stay the same (although I understanding rerunning meg may not be possible?)
In any case, what should the structure be?