Open jakubvojacek opened 5 years ago
Hey @jakubvojacek ,
I've had a look at it the other way. Yes, your error handler will catch most of the errors (making Safe less useful). That's actually ok. I did not want Safe to break existing error handlers.
Also, there are errors that are caught by Safe and not caught by error handlers (like when using json_decode I think).
I tried to document it here: https://thecodingmachine.io/introducing-safe-php
Still, I might reconsider if other people think I should do it. I'll keep the issue open meanwhile.
Hello,
I agree that adding @
to some internal function calls would make sense. The example of file_put_contents
seems to be a bit related to the Symfony Filesystem component. There they use @
a lot and in some cases use a custom error handler during the function call to catch the last error. See https://github.com/symfony/filesystem/blob/master/Filesystem.php.
Additionally I would love to see better handling of XML errors using libxml_use_internal_errors
. See https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/Config/Util/XmlUtils.php#L53 as an example.
I also would appreciate suppressing these warnings very much, this is similar/same issue https://github.com/thecodingmachine/safe/issues/120
Note: We are not using any custom error handler but we are using tracy/tracy
which catches all unhandled exceptions/errors and turns them into Error500 page, and logs the error. It obviously also stops execution of program.
Hello,
we have a custom error handler
and in combination with thecodingmachine/safe it does not work as I would expect. For example
Safe\file_put_contents
throws now ErrorException instead of FilesystemException because the warning is caught by my error handler. Adding@
toSafe\file_put_contents
does resolve it. Or is there a better way how to have custom handler and still use thecodingmachine/safe fully?Thank you Jakub