Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Once we pass by const reference, it may also be possible to send other mouse
data in
the future at no extra cost. For example, sending delta updates like requested
here:
http://pixeltoaster.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=a51670964328883a092a58556b0af9
be&topic=98.0
Original comment by bram.deg...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2007 at 1:26
i think we should leave it as it is for now, there is also a reason i think i
went
with pass by value as well btw. i forget what it is though - i wouldnt do such a
thing without having some reason, i tend to obsess over the API
i'll see if i can remember, i'm a bit distracted by a girl at the moment!
Original comment by glenn.fi...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2007 at 10:55
I understand ;)
But it would be nice to know why exactly you've made that choice.
Original comment by bram.deg...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2007 at 1:45
i'll look at it this weekend coming up and see if i can remember, it could have
simply been laziness ;)
Original comment by glenn.fi...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2007 at 5:00
leaving it as is, the choice was made because the mouse struct isnt very big,
so its not too bad to pass it into the
stack
Original comment by glenn.fi...@gmail.com
on 13 Sep 2008 at 4:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bram.deg...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2007 at 1:22