The editor's and tech leads are changing for next semester, and since our whilelist isn't dynamic and editable through the admin interface yet we need to update the hardcoded whitelist
How Has This Been Tested?
Shouldn't really need to be tested, the best I guess would be to have the future editors try logging in on our local machine but that's of course too much. In case we have a typo we can always just update it
Screenshots (if appropriate):
N/A
Checklist:
[x] My code follows the code style of this project. (see the style guide)
[x] My change requires a change to the documentation.
[x] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
[x] Coveralls reported increased code coverage, and full coverage for all the code I added / changed (or I have a good reason that I explained above for why this is not the case)
Coverage remained the same at 5.9% when pulling 1ab608a6ee39036dbbfe0cabbafb26f8825122f1 on emilgoldsmith-patch-1 into b019177cdc447017172973ffbffc973b16632752 on master.
Related Issue
N/A
Description
The editor's and tech leads are changing for next semester, and since our whilelist isn't dynamic and editable through the admin interface yet we need to update the hardcoded whitelist
How Has This Been Tested?
Shouldn't really need to be tested, the best I guess would be to have the future editors try logging in on our local machine but that's of course too much. In case we have a typo we can always just update it
Screenshots (if appropriate):
N/A
Checklist: