Closed geealbers closed 1 year ago
@rabarth1 I feel like I've flagged these in both first and second pages. Can you please take a look at these images? Figs 63.6 and 63.7 are identical graphs with only minor differences in the axis labels and visual elements. We shouldn't be including both in the book. From what I can make out in the text, 63.7 should be a completely different figure that addresses canvas shrinkage, or we should just eliminate 63.7 and its callout altogether.
Yes, Greg, you’re right. I went back through the original files and 63.6 should be left as is, table and caption, and the figure for 63.7 and its caption should be cut.
Thank you! Rachel
Rachel Barth Associate Editor, Getty Publications (310) 440-6513 @.***
[signature_3141772547]
From: Greg Albers @.> Date: Friday, June 16, 2023 at 12:46 PM To: thegetty/conserving-canvas @.> Cc: Rachel Barth @.>, Mention @.> Subject: Re: [thegetty/conserving-canvas] Figures 63.6 and 63.7 are near identical (Issue #53)
@rabarth1https://github.com/rabarth1 I feel like I've flagged these in both first and second pages. Can you please take a look at these images? Figs 63.6 and 63.7 are identical graphs with only minor differences in the axis labels and visual elements. We shouldn't be including both in the book. From what I can make out in the text, 63.7 should be a completely different figure that addresses canvas shrinkage, or we should just eliminate 63.7 and its callout altogether.
conserving-canvas--figs-63-6-and-63-7.png (view on web)https://github.com/thegetty/conserving-canvas/assets/7796401/3baadecc-a4a1-4d41-9ded-e373c9a6ddfd
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/thegetty/conserving-canvas/issues/53#issuecomment-1595205797, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADZIXK6TMHLLR6L5BEDCEGDXLSZ2NANCNFSM6AAAAAARXL2H6I. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Done with da7c253
The only differences are the axis labels and the caption. One of them must be incorrect.