Sets should be able to have rights associated with them - for example I do not have the right to add an item into the collection of the museum, nor to add a concept to the set of terms in AAT. Ed Ruscha and the GRI, conversely, have the right to add objects into the Ruscha archive. This means it needs to be a Legal Object.
Similarly, the Ruscha archive or a set of objects as an exhibition, can be "about" some set of topics. This means it needs to be a Propositional Object.
The merge point of these is Information Object, but the set is not Symbolic in nature. Thus two super-classes, as above.
Sets should be able to have rights associated with them - for example I do not have the right to add an item into the collection of the museum, nor to add a concept to the set of terms in AAT. Ed Ruscha and the GRI, conversely, have the right to add objects into the Ruscha archive. This means it needs to be a Legal Object.
Similarly, the Ruscha archive or a set of objects as an exhibition, can be "about" some set of topics. This means it needs to be a Propositional Object.
The merge point of these is Information Object, but the set is not Symbolic in nature. Thus two super-classes, as above.