New vocab entries, default boundary check, allow participant

[kasei]

@azaroth42 AAT 300008389 is now being used for both a city instance, and a CityName class. Is that intentional? Similarly for nation/CountryName (300128207).

(Sorry I didn't catch this before approval and merging!)

[azaroth42]

It is intentional. If it causes problems we can change it though :)

[kasei]

Would this be an appropriate modeling using both of those vocab elements?

{
  "id": "urn:uuid:b80463e2-b295-4a33-b95f-c1c9835fac70",
  "type": "Place",
  "_label": "Ghent, Belgium",
  "classified_as": [
    {
      "id": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300008389",
      "type": "Type",
      "_label": "City"
    }
  ],
  "identified_by": [
    {
      "id": "urn:uuid:aa10b83f-4856-4a72-bc65-e2f1e611276d",
      "type": "Name",
      "content": "Ghent",
      "classified_as": [
        {
          "id": "http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300008389",
          "type": "Type",
          "_label": "City"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

[azaroth42]

I don't think you would need to classify the name like that, as it's clearly the name of a city ... but I don't think it would be wrong per se, just unnecessary.

The intent is for distinguishing city names in addresses, when the different parts of the address are broken up. e.g. street number, street name, city, state, postal code, country.

[kasei]

So keep the classification on the Place, and then just use model.Name?

[azaroth42]

Yep :)