annalwood
commented
2 years ago Yes. Let’s use ancestral lands and note Ponca Ciry as contemporary location in a note field. Also put Ponca city in square brackets.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:55 PM stellasilbert @.***> wrote:
I noticed while reviewing society 23519, Chahiksichahiks (also known as Pawnee), that our society metadata uses the locations that indigenous groups resided in by the time they were recorded (in the case of 23519, Ponca City, Oklahoma), rather than their ancestral lands, whereas the EA uses the ancestral lands (Nebraska, in this case) and the focal years are older.
I assume this is okay, and it is up to researchers to use the focal years provided to determine whether they want to match our data to the EA data? Should we add some kind of warning to cases like this?
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/theglobaljukebox/cantometrics/issues/168, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUILTLPWLKO4VJYXVIGSWVDUIB42VANCNFSM5GPBOXLQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
--
www.culturalequity.org
https://archive.culturalequity.org
www.theglobaljukebox.org
“The precise role of the artist is to illuminate that darkness, blaze roads through that vast forest, so that we will not, in all our doing, lose sight of its purpose, which is to make the world a more human dwelling place." --- James Baldwin
I noticed while reviewing society 23519, Chahiksichahiks (also known as Pawnee), that our society metadata uses the locations that indigenous groups resided in by the time they were recorded (in the case of 23519, Ponca City, Oklahoma), rather than their ancestral lands, whereas the EA uses the ancestral lands (Nebraska, in this case) and the focal years are older.
I assume this is okay, and it is up to researchers to use the focal years provided to determine whether they want to match our data to the EA data? Should we add some kind of warning to cases like this?