Open barbaricyawps opened 4 years ago
I'm brainstorming a few possible use-case scenarios for the glossary project that we can use as we're thinking through our user personas.
Parent-child scenario - In this scenario, there is an authoritative parent guide that a smaller guide wants to inherit terms from. For example, let's imagine Google has developed a glossary for developer terms that I want to inherit in my smaller open-source project. So one persona would be the maintainer of the standard guide (the parent) and another persona would be the maintainer of the new open source guide. The maintainer of the open source guide might want to mostly inherit terms, but add some new ones, or modify a few of them for their needs. They might also want to submit their changes upstream to the parent guide.
Peer-to-peer scenario - In this scenario, there are two organizations that have developed their own separate guides with their own unique definitions. These two peer guides might want to import the terms from the other guide, but merely to use them as reference and identify how they are different. They might not want to merge, but just be aware of each other and cognizant of the differences.
Merging peers - Much like the previous scenario, we might have two organizations with their own separate guides that now want to merge their guides together and resolve all the merge conflicts.
These are just my initial thoughts on it. Are there other scenarios?
We got some excellent feedback in tonight's meeting:
We did another variant of the persona split in our Glossary pilot manifesto:
User stories
This project is designed to address the following use cases:
We need to create a set of user personas for the glossary project and validate those personas with project contributors.