Open camerons opened 4 years ago
We should consider this review comment:
In proposal-selection.md
Consider this comment in proposal-selection.md:
Consider this comment in proposal-selection.md
Consider this comment in proposal-selection.md
Payments should be correlated to milestones as github tasks. @Loquacity Does this mean that the payment is recorded in a github issue, or that it's linked to successful closure of a specific issue, or ... ?
@mgan59 yeah this is an interesting one... assuming payments are in the open-collective, and question there on getting them connected back to this.
I do think it makes sense for us to create a standard milestone concept across all our repos. I typically organize my milestones around Fiscal-Quarters as that is how I do my RoadMap planning.
Consider this comment in proposal-selection.md
When a milestone is reached:
@jaredmorgs If this is quick to fix then I'm 👍 otherwise leave it for the next iteration of this document IMHO.
@mgan59 contributor ?
The proposed proposal-selection.md is tied in a few places to Google Season of Docs. Feedback suggests we should break this tie.
This task is to investigate and find alternative processes which break the dependency on Google Season of Docs.
proposal-selection.md
@flicstar : Does this mean the program itself, or just the time frames for each working phase? It doesn't make sense (unless I'm missing something) that our project should align proposal work with a completely separate program run by another body. Perhaps the intention with this phrase was more about "We use the SoD as a guide for the different phases of work in a proposal, including how long each might typically run for". Or whatever. And then the URL should probably point to the timeline rather than the home page. No but that won't work because the timeline specifies a date. I'm tempted to remove this line altogether. If we want proposals to adhere to a certain framework (about timing) then we should create our own and publish that on a separate page.
@jaredmorgs: +1 to removing if this line is trying to suggest that we only sponsor projects through Google Season of Docs.
@jaredmorgs Happy to record this as an action but let it release as part of the initial alpha cut of the proposal selection guidelines.
@mgan59 I feel like GSoD should be a separate from this in some-way as the primary goal for Proposal-Selection should be for our community-contributors and GSoD is the edge-case?