Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
@parsch:
– some unnecessary 404s (on graphics) with chrome and safari. this should
definitely got to be fixed.
– with IE8, the javascripts seem to work fine (what a surprise, even the
sortables). the css needs to be updated in certain places (too much details to
explain right here).
the question is, if we want to support IE8. IMO it´s not much effort to make
it look alright.
my personal opinion: if we need to use hacks, we shouldn´t support IE8. if we
just need to cleanup stuff, we should.
Original comment by sehmaschine
on 28 Dec 2010 at 3:13
@sehmaschine
– the 404s on graphics result from hardcoded images in the original django
code. as we are not going to change that code we can only supply those images
(whichs mean delivering images for no other reason than avoiding the 404s).
– i'm not sure whether we should support IE8 or not: we left out IE7&8 as
they are not standard compliant and do not support any CSS3 features.
Furthermore Grappelli will use HTML5 in the future. We would have to use some
javascript to make that version available for IE8. That's why I would leave it
out.
As IE9 (which supports CSS3 and HTML5) will be released I would focuse the
efforts on supporting IE9.
Original comment by parsch.inc@gmail.com
on 30 Dec 2010 at 5:41
so we can say that we support firefox, chrome and safari ... right? issue
closed?
Original comment by sehmaschine
on 3 Jan 2011 at 9:10
@parsch.inc: please close the issue if it´s done. thanks.
Original comment by sehmaschine
on 10 Jan 2011 at 7:19
For me (using Grappelli 2.2 with Django 1.2), the "change password" and
"Logout" actions in the dropdown menu in the upper right corner do not work in
either Firefox 3.6.12 or Firefox 4.0b8 on Mac OS X 10.6.6. It seems as if the
click just closes the menu without loading the page. Works fine in Google
Chrome. I did not modify any of the Grappelli templates.
Original comment by sjaensch
on 12 Jan 2011 at 3:36
I just tested grapelli-trunk with Firefox 4b10 and couldn't reproduce this.
Still present in 2.2 though.
Original comment by sjaensch
on 26 Jan 2011 at 2:18
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
sehmaschine
on 27 Dec 2010 at 3:25