Structured summarization of legal case study

[thegreatshasha]

Classify the sentences of the case study into 7 rhetorical roles:

• Identifying the case: The sentences that are present in a judgment to identify the issues to be decided for a case. Courts call them as “Framing the issues”.
• Establishing facts of the case: The facts that are relevant to the present proceedings/litigations that stand proved, disproved or unproved for proper applications of correct legal principle/law.
• Arguing the case: Application of legal principle/law advocated by contending parties to a given set of proved facts.
• History of the case: Chronology of events with factual details that led to the present case between parties named therein before the court on which the judgment is delivered.
• Arguments (Analysis): The court discussion on the law that is applicable to the set of proved facts by weighing the arguments of contending parties with reference to the statute and precedents that are available..
• Ratio decidendi: Applying the correct law to a set of facts is the duty of any court. The reason given for application of any legal principle/law to decide a case is called Ratio decidendi in legal parlance. It can also be described as the central generic reference of text.
• Final decision: It is an ultimate decision or conclusion of the court following as a natural or logical outcome of ratio of the decision

[thegreatshasha]

Have filters on the basis of these labels so that a lawyer can just see the relevant sections of a case study without having to read the complete judgement.