Closed 1fifoto closed 1 year ago
Sample screen shot
Merged into master, closing.
If an import entry is missing, test fails. In my observation, if an import entry is included but unnecessary, test does not even produce a warning. Thus, I suggest that the import template become a superset of all possible import entries.
It may be possible to save an edit for "xxx" in:
// This is a mapping of the xxx execute file to an equivalent test case file
Perhaps it is as simple as having the comment reference the execute file name that appears just a line or so below.
Presently in #830 we generate console output when a macro (AK an execute file) runs. This output is used to create a test case by dispatching redux calls and checking the objective value. Then this console output must be copied and edited into an actual test case. The edits remove function name & line numbers along with deleting any spurious [Violation] output. This issue is to enhance this capability by creating a new ExecuteToTest view which no longer needs to be edited but can be copied directly into a test case file.